Showing posts with label Andy Vobora. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Andy Vobora. Show all posts

Sunday, October 9, 2011

Reprinted with permission from OMOT: "Believe it or not!!"

 September LTD Board Meeting
Summary Report

October 7, 2011

The following report is not fiction; strange and bizarre, but all true. We were there and can pass a lie detector test if needed. Call it an OMOT version of “BELIEVE It or NOT”. Kudos to Mike Dubick for looking out for the public. He noticed that the board was being asked to approve board minutes from Dec 2010. They were going to be approving about 8 months of overdue minutes (one of the months in the middle was missing?). He requested that the staff be more timely in providing the minutes since they are and should be in public record as soon as possible. Thank you Mr. Dubick for your logic; wish more of the Board had access to logic and common sense.

OMOT would like to suggest all the meetings be televised. Anyone can see that the minutes, even when they do appear, are not a true verbatim transcript but an abridged report that tends to favor LTD staff and goals and minimize any public participation. To televise would allow everyone to see and hear tonal inflections and not make the public have to trek to meetings. The viewers could then decide who is who and what is what from the comfort of their couch. Please remember we do not get paid to sit in meetings.

The report was from Point to Point Solutions and it was a great one! With much smiling and enthusiasm, it was presented as a great triumph. LTD received a $55,000 grant from ODOT to promote and study carpooling. Results of program: LTD distributed approx $4,138.75 in gift certificates to new and existing carpoolers who logged 10 trips. LTD spent $21,666.72 just to administer that little program. Board member Doris Towrey was very pleased with the end result of a calculated savings of $12,575.21 in fuel. Towrey said she loved numbers and wanted the TV stations notified. She forgot to notice that the ODOT grant allowed for $11,000 (20% of 55,000) to administer the entire grant amount. LTD spent $21,666.72on just that small program so they had to pull $10,666.72 out of the Point to Point budget. Good news is they have over $38,000 of the grant left, which is not for administrative costs. If they have the same rate of success, it will only cost $180,000 more in admin to make that last $39,861.25 disappear. Perhaps Ms. Towrey needs a calculator for that last bit. Oh, if you actually read the entire report, 31% of the enrolled people failed to fill out the pre-entry survey so the end data recovered was junk. My favorite quote from this report: Page 51 "From a budgetary perspective, the Carpool Incentive Program was able to exceed its goal of VMT/VMR reinforced using only 47% of projected program costs." Yup they actually printed that! Guess someone predicted even higher admin costs? P.S. Data on page 42 of board packet conflicts and says you saved 12,575.2 gallons of fuel when calculations in the chart on page 49 shows it is actually 3353.4 gallons.

Board member Gary Gillespie stayed in character. At last month’s Board meeting he said that LTD should not pay attention to elected officials since they are just trying to get elected. He thought the LTD Board and Staff should go to the planners and City Managers and ignore elected input. So after another month of thought, he had his brilliant observation for this month. He is concerned and is frustrated that LTD cannot just do what they want and are not in control of their own destiny. They have to answer to so many people and other local agencies! It is just not fair.

Duh. Mr. Gillespie, of the unelected LTD board, wants to have full control so he would have to get approval from no one? What else you want Mr. Gillespie- $94 million in your bank account and unlimited Power of Eminent Domain? And your third wish would be?

Tom Schwetz gave another glowing report that shows LTD does things better than Tri Met. He claims Tri -Met contacts no one on planned service routes until the projects are fully funded. He nearly dislocated his shoulder patting himself on the back. LTD has had 300 meetings with people on the West Eugene EmX Extension in the 4 years they have been working on it (that would be an average 75 per year and probably includes multiple visits to the same property owner). By the way he was carrying on, you would think they had never promised to meet with all 800-1200 property and business owners before submitting for the Small Starts $94 million grant on Sept 12th. Cossette Reese had, in prior public meetings and Board meetings, stated they would meet with all affected property owners. LTD made a whole list of property owners and said she and staff were diligently notifying and meeting with people. Guess a postcard was all they needed. I guess you may meet them at their office when they close your driveway.

Mr. Vobora, Director of Service Planning, did not have much to say. I am not sure, but he may have been benched for this meeting.

Tom Schwetz had a double feature. He had another grant they had to spend. So, LTD hired CH2M Hill to help waste funds. The CH2M guy was not too helpful, or maybe he was way more educated than this observer. But thank our lucky stars, Tom quickly cleared up everything. Let’s all get on this make believe bus and pretend it did not go to Ferry Street Bridge, but straight to the FUTURE! In that future, 2021, Lane County would not have 320,000 people but 400,000 bus hungry inhabitants. Eugene would have $7.00 a gallon gas so EVERYONE would ride the bus! So in the hypothetical world, what would the Board members suggest LTD do? Yes this is all true, it really happened, Believe it or not. They had two staff taking notes on easels. Tom was asking if the Board members did their homework problems. Tom could not seem to get the participation he wanted and many confused looks were exchanged. Some stuff was written on the two easels. The exercise just kind of ended with no conclusions. I would love to know what this exercise cost us taxpayers. Let’s see, two easels, two pens, CH2M Hill guy, Tom Schwetz time, misc staff time. Hopefully only $100,000, but if the prior Point To Point presentation is any comparison .........
The CH2M Hill guy went home, still smiling. Earth to Tom: Try reality next time in 2021. Gas $7.00 a gallon, LTD millions in the hole on underfunded pensions, LTD millions in hole on underfunded OPEB benefits, unfriendly business climate and slow growth policy causing severe lack of jobs in Eugene, and therefore, a less than 0.5% annual growth in county population.

Pension Plan: the Board was approving a new pension plan for new Admin hires; much less than the current plan cost. Interesting- not one board member asked why they did not fund the current employee health benefits costs and pension in the fiscal year the expense was incurred. Surprisingly, no one asked why they let the deficits grow and told the FTA they were in good financial health? Why did they not have any policy in place to insure it would never fall below proper funding levels? OMOT is now considering funding a grant for basic calculators for all Board and staff members. It’s possible LTD is already applying for 5307 Federal funds for calculator battery replacements.

My favorite part. Public input. First, an "elite sports car shop" owner asked if the board would put him on the payroll since he attended so many meetings and read so much transit data. They could have, but he asked too many questions they could not answer.

Next, a man read a letter for a lady from Springfield that asked LTD not to drive the bus down her street 84 times a day to turn it around. She was concerned for safety of children and thought the light side street overlay would not stand up to the wear and tear of heavy bus.

The final lady was the sweetest little old lady you have ever met. She had a neat handwritten notepaper filled on both sides. She stated that she gave up her car 20 years ago when her husband died. She formerly had a bus stop on her corner but no more since EmX came on in January. She could no longer do her church volunteer work easily, and was too tired if she had to walk. She stated she went to the Oakway Mall once and it took her 80 minutes one way; so, she had the eyeglasses mailed to her because she could not think of returning to the store. She uses Ride Source some now, but misses her freedom. She stated she felt like she had aged 10 years since the January implementation of the new EmX. You could have heard a pin drop during her talk and she repeatedly apologized for complaining. Hope LTD considers this issue of EmX: less stops further apart does not equal basic bus service. Sure will be interested in how much of this makes it into public record.

You would think the Board would think it their responsibility to look at a LTD financial statement or performance report. None were discussed and none found on the LTD website. Not updated since May and June. LTD wants the EmX expansion but sure doesn't want you to see the increase in maintenance costs that come with 60 ft buses nor the increase in admin costs while they are negotiating with the providers of service, the bus drivers.

Public records are apparently not too public right now. Don’t forget to sign the petition- and pass on the link to friends and family. http://www.petitiononline.com/EmX2010/petition.html

Tuesday, August 16, 2011

Why make promises you know you wont be keeping LTD?



Why make promises you know you wont be keeping LTD?


Can you imagine the trouble the west 11th, and 6th/7th area business community has in store for them if this proposed west end EmX extension goes through? (Sorry, one of these is out of time sequence.)

(Published with permission from OMOT/Chuck's Service Center Inc.)


----- Forwarded message -----
From: "Chuck's Service Center, Inc."
Date: Tue, Aug 16, 2011 10:55 AM
Subject: Construction
To: <vanwinkle@ltd.org>
Cc: <ourmoneyourtransit@gmail.com>

Hi Lisa,
Thanks for coming by yesterday. My employee told me about your visit to inform us of the EmX construction in front of my business today. It's so good to have the construction back because I was just wondering the other day if there was anything that could possibly make business any worse for us out here. And you came by. Thanks!
So anyway, my employee told me that you said construction would stop no later than 10am. Well, here it is nearly 11am and they're still out there (with no sign of wrapping up) as my business approaches the busiest time of the day. This is no surprise, however, as my previous information regarding EmX construction has always been incorrect and far more damaging to my business than predicted by LTD.
Regards,
--
Cc: OMOT
_____________________________________
Chuck's Service Center, Inc.
2091 Franklin Blvd
Eugene, OR 97403

Excellence In Customer Service Since 1958
_____________________________________
From: Chuck's Service Center, Inc.

Date: Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 12:46 PM
Subject: Re: Construction
To: LTD NoBuild <ourmoneyourtransit@gmail.com>



Doing some sort of concrete work. A patch-over where they had to dig down to something maybe...
It looks like they're leaving now, at 12:45. Just at the end of our lunch rush, of course....
Thanks Erin,
 
--




On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 12:38 PM, LTD NoBuild <ourmoneyourtransit@gmail.com> wrote:
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Chuck's Service Center, Inc. 
Date: Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 12:20 PM
Subject: Re: Construction
To: LTD NoBuild <ourmoneyourtransit@gmail.com>



It was Lisa Vanwinkle, don't know if you know her. She's very nice like all LTD reps are nice. Oh so polite and say nothing of any meaning. Anyway, I did not speak to her when she was here in person. My employee gave me the card she left, and told me that (she said) they would wrap up the construction at 7am, with worst case scenerio being 10 am. It's 12:15 now and the cones are still up, and the crew is eating lunch. (Noon is my busiest rush of business each day.)
When the opening staff arrived this morning, he found two of their vehicles on the lot, having not asked permission. We had to ask them to move them so our traffic flow would be restored.
I had trouble with Lisa's email address, so I spoke with her on the phone around 11. She said they shouldn't have parked on the lot, and it was her understanding that they would finish "within the hour." She was very nice of course. I sent the original email to her again.
As for media attention, that's ok, feel free to circulate the email. I won't comment to the press any more though. Not since my experiences with them in the gas tax matter a few years ago. After that, I instituted a strict no comment policy towards any media for me and the staff here.
But they're certainly welcome to come by and take pictures.
I CC'd you on the original email because I thought you would find it interesting, just or a sort of FYI. I never did ask what exactly the construction was all about.
Thanks Erin,
--
_____________________________________
Chuck's Service Center, Inc.
2091 Franklin Blvd
Eugene, OR 97403

Excellence In Customer Service Since 1958


On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 1:46 PM, VANWINKLE Lisa <Lisa.VanWinkle@ltd.org> wrote:
Casey, thank you for expressing your concerns and allowing LTD to respond. When I spoke to your employee yesterday, I explained that the construction work might extend past 10 a.m. depending on what the contractor encountered when they excavated the storm water pipe. We are sorry that it took the contractor a few more hours than anticipated to complete the work.

LTD and the contractor minimized the impact to your business, adjacent businesses, and the traveling public by scheduling the work to begin in the late evening and progress until done. We also used a type of concrete that firms up rapidly to restore normal traffic flow as soon as possible.

Again, we are sorry the work extended longer than anticipated. We appreciate that you gave us the opportunity to respond to your comments.

Saturday, August 13, 2011

OMOT claims that LTD can’t provide the data to back up their claims.


Published with permission from Stop The Green Dragon/OMOT.


 OurMoneyOurTransit@gmail.com


From: Erin
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2011 10:25 AM
To: VOBORA Andy; REES Cosette; KORTGE Dean
Subject: Please provide research referenced

Andy-
You stated:
"the plan moves EmX and right turning vehicles out of traffic flow for the most part.... research shows that would help traffic run more efficiently."

LTD has been referencing this research for a long time, and now I think I would like to see it.

Could you please provide the research citation that shows this?  and keep in mind, the existing conditions on 6th/7th.  There currently are NO buses that stop in traffic.  So technically you will not be "moving" EmX out of traffic because it was never there.  I would like the research that shows "re-assigning" a lane that currently does not contain bus stops will improve traffic. 

Thanks-
Erin
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: VOBORA Andy
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2011 10:32 AM
To: 'Erin'; REES Cosette; KORTGE Dean; EVANS John
Subject: RE: Please provide research referenced

The research referred to was the initial DKS studies that you have.  The traffic analysis is being updated as part of the analysis of the LPA and will be available in the near future. 

John – Will the traffic analysis be available when the small starts application goes to FTA?

Andy Vobora
Director of Service Planning, Accessibility, and Marketing
Lane Transit District
541-682-6181 (office)
541-501-9398 (cell)
andy.vobora@ltd.org

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
 From: Erin
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2011 10:37 AM
To: VOBORA Andy
Cc: REES Cosette; KORTGE Dean; EVANS John
Subject: Re: Please provide research referenced-
 as far as i know, this report focused on current conditions and projections for 2031, not the day after you take the lane away.  Is this the only research you have?  i typically think of "research shows" as existing information out there to compare to. 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 10:44 AM, EVANS John <john.evans> wrote:</john.evans>
Andy and Erin- to be more precise, your statement should have said “all previous project analysis (see current AA report) and preliminary indications from current analysis still underway indicates…”

The full analysis of the project, including all traffic analysis will be available in its entirety for OMOT’s (and the public’s) review and comment when it is completed, reviewed and published later this year.  ODOT and the City of Eugene transportation engineers have been participants in the design and refinement of the project from the beginning.  We are currently working through a typical process of review and coordination with ODOT which will be followed by additional detailed technical review by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA). Following these reviews by the agencies responsible for verifying the validity of the analyses, FTA will direct LTD to publish the full project analysis as part of the Environmental Assessment which will be available for full review and comment by the public.

John Evans, AICP
Senior Project Manager
Lane Transit District
PO Box 7070
Eugene, OR 97401
Phone: 541-682-6146
Cell: 541-913-6430

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Erin
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2011 11:33 AM
To: EVANS John
Cc: VOBORA Andy; KORTGE Dean; REES Cosette; Matt Cooper
Subject: Re: Please provide research referenced

So the only research is your own analysis, which isnt even completed?

I think if you are going to make public claims that you are basing this on research, you should have something in hand that supports your theory, and not tell me to wait until a tentative report is released in a few months (and with the history of LTD and the FTA, release dates seem to be delayed more than not). 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 11:43 AM, VOBORA Andy <andy.vobora> wrote:</andy.vobora>
The research has been done and continues to be done by qualified professionals.  The updates will be ready when the engineers complete their work and the process, as John explained, allows the distribution of the information. 

Andy Vobora
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Erin
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2011 11:50 AM
To: VOBORA Andy
Cc: EVANS John; KORTGE Dean; REES Cosette; Matt Cooper
Subject: Re: Please provide research referenced

ok, then, can you please provide the research that shows "re-assigning" a lane that currently does not contain bus stops will improve traffic at the time it is implemented?  because this is what you seem to be claiming.....
maybe you can provide the page number on that DKS report that shows this? 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 11:52 AM, EVANS John <john.evans> wrote:</john.evans>
Erin- please see my response below that states’ “ all previous project research and…”.  We were attempting to be responsive to your group’s request for detailed final information while the formal federal analysis is ongoing.  Please refer to the AA report for information about the previous alternatives.  For the LPA design-specific effects, I can understand the desire to have all possible information immediately available upon request but we have to ask for your understanding of the current stage of the project (analyzing the LPA) and how we are following the project’s requirements for the analysis to be developed, reviewed and released for public comment.

John Evans, AICP

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Erin
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2011 1:16 PM
To: EVANS John
Cc: VOBORA Andy; KORTGE Dean; REES Cosette; Matt Cooper; sonny.p.chickering@odot.state.or.us
Subject: Re: Please provide research referenced

So- your corrected statement is "all previous project analysis (see current AA report) and preliminary indications from current analysis still underway indicates it would help traffic run more efficiently".

Considering the AA doesn't include year of implementation, you have nothing to support your claims besides the upcoming analysis results?  that is a pretty simple question that you seem to be sidestepping.  Either that, or all your claims of "help" only exist in 2031. 

Here is a report that talks about "re-assigning" a lane, and how it is not the preferred method in the US.  and this is based on a system with buses stopping in traffic, which we dont have.   This report show a few reasons EmX in Eugene is a flawed plan. 

www.itdp.org/documents/20110526ITDP_USBRT_Report-HR.pdf

and your statement " I can understand the desire to have all possible information immediately available..." is a little misleading.  i just wanted information you are currently basing statements on, that would assume you have it in hand. 

Tuesday, August 9, 2011

Dear LTD, are you listening to yourselves?

That EmX Bus is Empty


BY MIKE WEBER AND SCOTT REYNOLDS
 
 
 
Recently, Kevin Prociw of LCCRG created a short music video titled "That Emx Bus is Empty" which illustrated just how poorly utilized LTD's $43 million Gateway/River Bend line is. Tonight, this video was highlighted on KEZI 9 news, and Andy Vobora, LTD's Director of Service Planning, Accessibility and Marketing stated that "the video was shot during a time when numbers are typically low for a college town" and "having only been in service for about five or six months, it's probably a little too early to make a judgment about how successful the ridership is." 
 
Let's rewind to a little less than two weeks ago, when LTD Communications Coordinator Lisa Van Winkle said on KEZI on July 28 that "Even though we had to reduce the total number of hours, because we're still attracting a higher ridership, our efficiency is actually better" and that Gateway EmX expansion has increased ridership for the EmX by 40%.
 
Too soon to be judged, or increased ridership by 40%? Are we confused, or is LTD confused?
 
Giving LTD the benefit of the doubt here, let's give Vobora's theory about college town numbers being low. The route to Gateway/River Bend does not run through any areas that have a large UO student population, and primarily serve the hospital, a few large employers north of Beltline Road (Symantec, Royal Caribbean), a few neighborhoods and the Gateway shopping district. LTD has claimed the majority of their riders are going to and from work. College/school is second, again according to LTD.
 
Given that the footage was filmed between 7 a.m. and noon on a Friday, this covers a time in the morning during which commuters are typically going to work. However, all there was to be found during the morning "rush hour" were mostly empty buses everywhere along the route. Considering the areas served by this route, student utilization of this route should not be a major factor, and even if it was, how effective a utilization of $43 million in capital improvements plus operating costs is this route? 
 
The fact is, a regular bus served this area very effectively, and could have continued to do so.
 
But who knows anymore, as LTD can't stick to one story? VanWinkle thinks that rider numbers will go down in the fall, isn't that when the college students come back? But Vobora says this is typical for a college town right now to have empty buses. OOPS, just who is in charge there at LTD? 
 
As has been well publicized, LTD is looking to spend $80-100 million to build a new EmX route out West 11th Avenue that would terminate near where the Wal-Mart store is. Yes, folks, a bus to Wal-Mart! As of now, it is very clear that LTD did not predict the future very well when it built the Gateway EmX line, and now it wants to apply for tens of millions of dollars of FEDERAL funds for another EmX line with, again, an unproven need. We received an e-mail on March 7, 2011 from Vobora in response to a question asked about how utilized buses currently are along West 11th. The response was that about 900 boardings per day occur along West 11th between Garfield and Commerce streets. When one considers that the proposed EmX line would have 80 runs in each direction, for a total of over 160 trips, that works out to fewer than 6 boardings per trip based on current ridership! Spending $80-100 million to run even more nearly empty buses seems like an absolutely asinine proposal!
 
LTD is looking more like a three ringed circus then a transit service. EmX buses empty for half the day, running red lights and an LTD bus going the wrong way down a one way street. LTD was politely telling a Facebook community page to remove their page even though it was 100% within the guidelines for a Facebook community page, and create a Facebook group? Lost funding for the student bus pass program? What is going on at LTD? Things have only become worse since former GM Mark Pangborn retired. It looks like he got out just in the nick of time.
 
But there is a silver lining. LTD just received a FEDERAL grant to replace the 20 year old bus signs that are still readable. That is on the remaining routes left., not the EmX lines. See, the important stuff is getting done.